Legal Opinion

Excel Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 12, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtSingh, J.

Plaintiff Excel Physical Therapy, Inc. (“Excel”) filed this action to recover payments for personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits pursuant to G.L.c. 90, §34M. Defendant Commerce Insurance Company (“Commerce”) has appealed the trial court’s allowance of summary judgment in favor of Excel. We agree that summary judgment should not have been entered, and return the case for trial.

This case arises out of an alleged automobile accident on January 24,2005. Excel claimed that one of its patients was a passenger in the involved automobile, which was insured by Commerce. After conducting an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Mar-Lees Seafood, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Bay State Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  4. Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  5. Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API