Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 6, 2009No. AC 30509PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The defendant, Anthony L. Henry, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly failed to credit him for 411 days of presentence confinement that he was supposed to receive pursuant to a plea agreement he entered on June 15, 2005. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following undisputed facts and procedural background are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. The defendant was arrested and charged on three separate occasions with, inter alia,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. State v. PaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. DixsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. CazzettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API