Legal Opinion

Petty v. City of El Dorado

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 2001No. 84,665PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, ].:

The City of El Dorado (City) appeals the district court’s determination that the provision of a municipal diversion agreement requiring a defendant to serve time in the county jail was void because the City lacked statutory authority to require jail time as a condition of the diversion agreement. The defendant cross-appealed the district court’s application of equitable estoppel and its finding that the entire diversion agreement was illegal and void and returning the parties to their preagreement status.

The City created a pretrial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. United American State Bank v. Wild West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. In Re the Marriage of TrasterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Swimwear Solution, Inc. v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API