Webster v. Woods
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ROMANG, Judge:. The Plaintiffs-Appellees brought this action to specifically perform a written contract to convey certain real property. The Defendants-Appellants answered and counterclaimed for reformation of the written contract to reflect that the Plaintiffs had not fully paid their obligation including interest. 1 The District Court sustained Plaintiffs’ demurrer to the answer and counterclaim on the ground that it alleged an oral “agreement or agreements that are viola-tive of the statutes of the State of Oklahoma . . . .” Although the District Court did not refer to any authority it is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cunnius v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Ware v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Crabb v. ChisumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pasternak v. Lear Petroleum Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Exxon Corporation v. Allen GannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Thrifty Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Brown Flight Rental One Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
- Fireside Thrift of Hawaii, Inc. v. Kealoha (In Re Kealoha)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.