Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lujan
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 19, 1991No. CIV 90-230 PCT RCBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Defendants, Secretary Lujan, the Tuba City School Board and the Lukachukai School Board cross-moved for summary judgment. The court heard oral argument on June 24, 1991 and now rules.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff, Mary Ann Smith, is a female member of the Navajo Tribe. She was employed by the Office of Indian Education (“OIE”), Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), United States Department of the Interior from 1965 through 1976, at a BIA Boarding School in Holbrook, Arizona. From 1976 through 1982, Ms. Smith was employed in the Navajo…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lopez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2000