Legal Opinion

Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1935No. 25289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the unambiguous provisions of Sections 1465-31, 5611-1, 5611-2 and 5609, General Code, and upon the authority of State, ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, 128 Ohio St., 553, 192 N. E., 787; State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, 124 Ohio St., 269, 178 N. E., 258, 78 A. L. R., 1079, and State, ex rel. Tax Commission of Ohio, v. Faust, Aud., 113 Ohio St., 365, 149 N. E., 197.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Tax Commission v. FaustOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welfare Federation v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Torbet v. KilgoreOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ide Trucking Co. v. Schneider, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API