Carr v. Aramark Food and Support Services Group Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION RUSSELL CARR, ) ) PLAINTIFF ) v. ) ) 7:21-cv-00712-LSC ARAMARK FOOD AND ) SUPPORT SERVICES INC. ) AND ARAMARK ) EMPLOYEE “A” ) DEFENDANTS. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and Plaintiff’s request to conduct discovery regarding the fictitiously named defendant. (Doc. 4; Doc. 7 at 2.) The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for review. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 4) and request to conduct discovery (Doc. 7 at 2)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Green v. Mutual of OmahaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Walker v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.