Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Reznick
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 2, 2008No. 1:08-cr-00050PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED
Opinion and Order
PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Nielson & Royal’s Motion for Summary Judgment:
Finding that Royal & Nielson Complied with Local Civil Rule 7.1; Declining to Consider Plaintiffs’ Request for Rule 11 Sanctions; Holding that Michigan’s Res Judicata Doctrine Does Not Preclude the Plaintiffs’ Claims; Dismissing the Plaintiffs’ FDCPA Claim as Time-Barred
This is a federal civil-rights and fair debt collection practices action against fifteen defendants. In June 2008, three of the defendants — Seth D. Gould (“Gould”), the firm Wienner & Gould,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- JDC MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Lakeland Regional Health System v. Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Crehan v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.