Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Bodoff

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 2, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-10633-NMGPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In the instant dispute, James H. Robinson (“Robinson”) alleges that his former Attorneys, Joseph Bodoff (“Attorney Bo-doff’) and Preston Halperin (“Attorney Halperin”), and their law firm, Shectman Levy & Halperin (“SLH”) committed fraud and malpractice while representing him on several legal matters. Robinson now moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability for malpractice (Docket No. 16) and defendants move for summary judgment on all counts (Docket No. 23).

I. Factual Background

In 1987, Robinson, together with John Leatham…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Castro-Medina v. Procter & Gamble Commercial Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  2. Limone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  3. Rivera Maldonado v. Hospital Alejandro Otero LopezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  4. Nattah v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Del Toro-Pacheco v. Pereira-CastilloDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API