Legal Opinion

Castro-Medina v. Procter & Gamble Commercial Co.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided June 28, 2008No. Civ. 04-2274 (PG)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dilian Castro Medina (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Castro”) filed this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 (“ADA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., against her employer, The Procter & Gamble Commercial Company (“P & G”, “Defendant” or “the Company”), alleging discrimination and harassment on the basis of a protected disability. See Docket No. 1. As part of her discrimination claim, Plaintiff alleges that P & G failed to reasonably accommodate her disability, and wrongfully terminated and retaliated…

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Colon-Fontanez v. Municipality of San JuanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  2. Godoy v. Maplehurst Bakeries, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
  3. Aguirre v. Mayaguez Resort & Casino, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  4. Echevarria v. AstraZeneca, LPDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
  5. Díaz-Casillas v. Doctors' Ctr. Hosp. San JuanUnited States District Court · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API