Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 1466PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This is an appeal by Frank Young from the adverse decision of the trial court sitting without a jury. 1 We affirm.

In 1963, the State of Alaska let a construction contract to Peter Kiewit Sons’ Company for the construction of a highway to Chena Hot Springs, north of Fairbanks. The contract specifications required Peter Kiewit Sons’ Company to construct completed bridge approaches, the bridges themselves to be contracted for separately by the state.

On September 12, 1964, Edward Krivak and appellant Young, his passenger, drove in Krivak’s car to the area where the road…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Thomas Spinozzi and Linda Spinozzi v. Itt Sheraton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1973
  4. Taranto v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hale v. O'NEILLAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API