Miller v. Miller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals.from the trial court’s granting of defendant’s summary judgment motion. Plaintiff contends that summary judg-*74merit should not have been granted because the testator devised the remaining proceeds of the promissory note to plaintiff under his will. Plaintiff alleges that defendant has no right to the promissory note because the property which was sold in exchange for the promissory note was owned by testator alone. Therefore, plaintiff contends testator’s will should control the disposition of the proceeds because testator alone was entitled to the proceeds of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Fast v. GulleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mullinix v. MabryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005