Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

There was evidence that the seed potatoes, fertilizer and strawberry crates seized by the sheriff under the warrant of attachment as the property of W. M. Murphy were the property of Samuel Snell, of Philadelphia, and were in the j)ossession of Murphy at the time of the seizure as agent of Snell. Upon the ruling of his Honor that certain evidence offered by Murphy was not competent because Samuel Snell had not intervened and was not a party to this action, defendant Murphy moved that said Samuel Snell be allowed to intervene as a party defendant. The deposition of Samuel Snell had been taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Temple v. Eades Hay Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilder v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API