Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1931No. 23186. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was based upon a life insurance policy. In its answer, the defendant affirmatively pleaded a breach of the conditions of the policy by the insured. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, from which it was concluded that no recovery could be had. From the judgment entered dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.

The facts are these: May 28, 1928, the respondent issued its policy of industrial life insurance on the life of Florence Fraser in the amount of three hundred fifty dollars, naming as beneficiary therein the executor or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Logan v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kirkpatrick v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Price v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. American National Insurance v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Doernbecher v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hebert Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API