Legal Opinion
City of Dayton v. Allen
City of Dayton Municipal Court
Decided May 18, 1971No. 337720PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
FACTS. Late in the evening of March 6, 1970, two city of Dayton police officers, one of whom was Patrolman Kirkland, observed the defendant, Betty Allen, a known prostitute whom Kirkland had previously arrested for prostitution, and several other females, also known prostitutes, standing in front of the premises located at *1821419 West Third Street, a known house of prostitution. The ladies were waving at automobiles and attempting to stop them. The defendant was arrested and charged with congregating in a place of prostitution.
This was not the first time that officer Kirkland had seen this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Herndon v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Akron v. MasseyAkron Municipal Court · 1978
- City of Cleveland v. HowardCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1987
- State v. NormanOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Columbus v. StarghillFranklin County Municipal Court · 1973