Legal Opinion

Armstead v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided September 3, 2021No. 8:21-cv-00183Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LAWANNA ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, 8:21CV183 vs. MEMORANDUM UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the court for an initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se, in forma pauperis Complaint (Filing 1) to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). I. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges only that: “I was discriminated against by my employer due to my age, race, and disability. Union Pacific decided to violate the laws denying my right to work without my rights…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API