Municipality of Anchorage v. Repasky
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 1995 and again in 1997, after the Anchorage Assembly enacted ordinances for the Anchorage School District's annual budgets and for the local source appropriations for those budgets, Anchorage Mayor Rick Mys-trom invoked the item veto power and reduced the total amount of each budget and local source appropriation. Was this a valid exercise of the mayor's veto power? We hold that it was. 'We conclude that the item veto power granted by the Anchorage Municipal Charter extends to the assembly's school district budget and local source appropriation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Jefferson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Cenarrusa v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Susan Holz v. Nenana City Public School District Terry Bentley Joanne Romero Endil MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Crouse Ex Rel. CrouseAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Carmony v. McKechnieAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.