Legal Opinion

State v. Kirby

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 14, 1972No. 725SC489PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant’s first assignments of error relate to the warrant upon which he was tried and convicted. The affidavit portion of the warrant reads as follows:

“The State of North Carolina v. Roderick Lionell Kirby-Age 18, Race N, Sex M 11 N. Lincoln Ct., City

Complaint for Arrest

The undersigned, W. R. Pearson, being duly sworn, complains and says that at and in the county named above and on or about the 1st day of Oct., 1971, the defendant named above did unlawfully, wilfully,

#1. Violate the law by assaulting an officer, to wit: W. R. Pearson by pushing him and striking him…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. PartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Brooks v. N.C. Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. CoriaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API