Legal Opinion

Eerdmans v. Maki

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 196898PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

This case arises out of plaintiff’s failed attempt to purchase an undeveloped tract of real property in Kent County. The property was owned by defendant Jeneane Parmenter and by Allen Parmenter 1 and was listed for sale by defendant Clint Maki, a real estate agent operating under the broker’s license of defendant Westdale Better Homes and Gardens, Inc. Plaintiff became aware of the property when he saw the following advertisement, which appeared in the May 7, 1994, edition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Baker v. Arbor Drugs, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Pakideh v. Franklin Commercial Mortgage Group, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Atkinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Derderian v. Genesys Health Care SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Pitsch v. Ese Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Gage Products Co. v. Henkel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Cole v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API