Cole v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
Defendant appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order that denied its motion for summary disposition and granted summary disposition to plaintiff. We reverse.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff sustained injuries when he was riding a bicycle and was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by an unidentified driver.' Plaintiff sought uninsured motorist benefits from defendant under a policy issued to his father. The policy provides, in relevant part:
a. We will pay compensatory damages you are legally entitled to recover:(1) from the owner or operator of any uninsured automobile;(2)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Iqbal v. Bristol West Insurance GroupMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Michelle Wagner v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Converge, Incorporated v. Topy AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.