Ocean Technology, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue, one of first impression before the Claims Court, is whether, under the Prompt Payment Act, the Government is obligated to pay a contractor interest on a late payment for merchandise which was ordered and accepted pursuant to an option created after the Act’s effect date, but which incorporated the terms and prices of a contract entered into before the effective date of the statute. Briefing was limited, as plaintiff did not respond to defendant’s cross-motion. During…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Janowsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.