Legal Opinion
Janowsky v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 6, 1991No. 90-3846 CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*707OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion supplements an earlier unpublished opinion. Janowsky v. United States, No. 90-3846 (Cl.Ct. April 19, 1991). In that earlier opinion, we raised sua sponte but did not rule on two potentially dispositive issues: (i) whether plaintiffs’ claim that the FBI breached an implied-in-fact contract to compensate them for their services and for the use of their business as a front for an undercover FBI investigation is subject to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) and (ii) whether plaintiffs’ claim that the FBI took their business for law enforcement purposes…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heritage Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- McElmurray v. Augusta-Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Perri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Gary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.