Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1989No. D008815PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Following denial of a motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), Vernon Darnell King entered a negotiated no contest plea to possessing a controlled substance for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on three years’ probation including a condition he serve one hundred and eighty days in custody. King appeals.

At approximately 10 p.m. on February 15, 1988, San Diego Police Officers Michael Ott and Kenneth Winklepleck were on patrol in the 600 block of 30th Street. Officer Ott stopped a Datsun 280Z after noticing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BumpusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. H.M.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. BruecknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API