Legal Opinion
People v. Brueckner
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1990No. D010060PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Robert Paul Brueckner appeals his conviction after pleading guilty to possession of a controlled substance for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.) Brueckner contends the court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, 1 § 1538.5) because (1) the citizen informant’s statements were unreliable, (2) the officer lacked probable cause to detain him, and (3) the vehicle search was improper. We affirm.
Facts 2
At 12:30 a.m. on April 13, 1988, Escondido Police Officer Martin Silva stopped a Chevrolet driven by Mark Seiferth. Intending to cite Seiferth for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Arterburn v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Reyes CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.