Legal Opinion

People v. Medina

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 2003No. B159372PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

May officers, as a matter of standard procedure and in the name of "officer safety," detain and frisk a driver stopped for an equipment infraction solely on the basis that the stop occurs in a high crime area at night? Here we conclude that the Fourth Amendment does not permit such an intrusion and that any incriminating evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. H.M.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. United States v. Rodolfo Suarez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. H.H.California Court of Appeal · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API