Legal Opinion

Duplechin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1983No. 378-83PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for aggravated assault. After finding Appellant guilty, the jury further found that he had twice previously been convicted of felony offenses. Punishment was assessed at life.

In his petition for discretionary review, Appellant presents three grounds of error in which he maintains that one of the prior convictions alleged and used for enhancement purposes is based upon a fundamentally defective indictment. The court of appeals found that nothing was presented for review due to Appellant’s failure to raise…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Ex Parte NivensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Duplechin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hogue v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Ex parte PueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Ex Parte MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Frederick Douglas Weaver v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API