Legal Opinion

Frederick Douglas Weaver v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1984No. 83-1215PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANDALL, Circuit Judge:

In this habeas corpus proceeding, we are called upon to decide if the district court properly denied relief because of the appellant’s failure to comply with the applicable state contemporaneous objection rule. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background.

The appellant, Frederick Weaver, was convicted of aggravated robbery in 1977 in Texas state court. At the punishment phase of the trial, the prosecution introduced evidence of two prior convictions, one from Illinois in 1960 for automobile theft, and one from Kansas in 1965 for robbery. 1…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hogue v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Frank Smith v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Lawrence John Stokes v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API