Legal Opinion
Pindle v. Poteat
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2003No. 00-2693 (RJL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON, District Judge.
In this petition for habeas corpus, petitioner challenges as an unconstitutional ex post facto law the application to him of United States Parole Commission guidelines that were not in effect at the time he was sentenced. In a Memorandum and Order filed on June 24, 2002, the court ruled that discovery would be appropriate to determine whether under the Parole Commission’s guidelines its “discretion ... is totally or very substantially circumscribed in law or in fact and yields results materially harsher than those ordinarily occurring under the prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Eric A. Glascoe v. Mark A. BezyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Rios v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Keitt v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Glascoe, Eric v. Bezy, Mark A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005