Legal Opinion

Thorstad v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1937No. Nos. 31,024, 31,130PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff’s action to recover damages for personal injuries as a result of a collision between a car driven by defendant Doyle, in which she was a passenger, and a car driven by defendant Eoberg, resulted in a verdict in her favor and against both defendants for $3,500. Defendant Eoberg moved for judgment notwithstanding or for new trial, and defendant Doyle moved for a new trial. The motions were denied, and defendants appealed.

The issues made by the pleadings are these: Plaintiff’s complaint is in the nsual form where two negligent causes combine to bring about a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Samonthia v. AhasaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Burgess v. CraftsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Johnson Tsai v. Anne C. Rosenthal and Mound Motors, Inc., Anne C. Rosenthal v. Johnson Tsai and Mound Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API