Legal Opinion

Neel v. American Woodmark Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 2006No. 102,422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JANE P. WISEMAN,

Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Claimant, Porter Neel,1 seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the workers’ compensation court affirming the trial court’s denial of his claim against Respondent, American Woodmark Corporation, pursuant to 85 O.S.2001 § 11(B)(5). The issue on appeal is whether the finding that Respondent was not Claimant’s employer for the last 90 days of injurious exposure is supported by competent evidence. We find that it is and affirm.

¶ 2 Prior to working for Respondent, Claimant worked as a furniture builder for La-Z-Boy, where he began…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Hughes v. Cole Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Heat Transfer & Equipment v. CauthonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Emery v. Wal-Mart Super Center No. 576Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API