Neel v. American Woodmark Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JANE P. WISEMAN,
Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Claimant, Porter Neel,1 seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the workers’ compensation court affirming the trial court’s denial of his claim against Respondent, American Woodmark Corporation, pursuant to 85 O.S.2001 § 11(B)(5). The issue on appeal is whether the finding that Respondent was not Claimant’s employer for the last 90 days of injurious exposure is supported by competent evidence. We find that it is and affirm.
¶ 2 Prior to working for Respondent, Claimant worked as a furniture builder for La-Z-Boy, where he began…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hughes v. Cole Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Heat Transfer & Equipment v. CauthonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Emery v. Wal-Mart Super Center No. 576Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012