Legal Opinion

Simmonds v. Meyn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 30, 1932No. 30,086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to enjoin the construction and operation of a filling station on lot number 166 on Massachusetts street in Lawrence, and to have adjudged void ordinance number 1739 of the city of Lawrence, which amended a prior zoning ordinance of the city. The trial court made findings of fact and rendered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. The findings of fact tell the story of the controversy, as follows:

*420“1. The defendant, Fritz Meyn, is the owner of lot number 166, Massachusetts street, Lawrence, Kan., which is located at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. City of Topeka v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. City of Wichita v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spurgeon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Gas Service Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Konitz v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Ford v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Barker v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API