Legal Opinion
Garner v. Runyon
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided April 18, 1991No. 90-AR-1296-NWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
This case is before the court on motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Marvin Runyon and John Waters, as Directors of Tennessee Valley Authority.
Pertinent Undisputed Facts
Between March and June of 1987, TVA posted two notices of vacancies, Vacancy Announcement Number TLBFN-28 (VA-28) and Vacancy Announcement Number TLBFN-29 (VA-29), which were designed to fill approximately 75 nuclear plant laborer positions on the so-called “annual schedule”. At TVA nuclear plant laborers on the “annual schedule” are paid more, receive better benefits, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Harris v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rice v. City Of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021