Legal Opinion
Harris v. Civil Service Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1998No. A078480Published
1Opinion of the Court
77 Cal.Rptr.2d 366 (1998)
65 Cal.App.4th 1356
Madeline HARRIS, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION of the City and County of San Francisco et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. A078480.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two.
August 5, 1998.
Review Denied October 28, 1998.
Michael S. Sorgen and Andrea Adam Brott, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, Vicki Clayton, Chief Labor Attorney, M. Diane Weber, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.
LAMBDEN, Associate Justice.
This action is based on a claimed violation of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.