Legal Opinion
Rex Chainbelt, Inc. v. General Kinematics Corporation, and Albert Musschoot
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 30, 1966No. 15213_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOCH, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court entered a decree finding the Musschoot Patent, No. 2,984,339, valid and in fringed by the defendants-appellants, General Kinematics Corporation and Albert Musschoot. This appeal followed.
The plaintiff Rex Chainbelt, Inc., acquired the patent in suit when it purchased the assets of Carrier Conveyor Corporation, by whom Albert Musschoot had been employed.
The District Court found that Mr. Musschoot assumed duties with Carrier under a two-year contract which called for an annual salary of $18,000 with an option to purchase company stock, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Casco Products Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- The Ekco Products Company, Inc. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- General Motors Corporation v. ProvusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Wilson v. Seng Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Grice Engineering, Inc. v. JG Innovations, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Kenneth White v. Mar-Bel, Inc., and Mr. Dan MarshlackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.