Legal Opinion
Steinmark v. Parratt
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 2, 1977No. Civ. 76-L-56PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHATZ, District Judge.
This is an action for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, brought by the petitioner, Donald Steinmark, attacking his conviction on two counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of Neb. Rev.Stat. § 28 — 4,125 (Cum.Supp.1974). Petitioner, an individual with no prior misdemeanor or felony convictions, was sentenced to and is presently serving three to nine years on each count, with the sentences to run consecutively, at the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. His conviction was affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of Nebraska.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. John C. Dela RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. SteinmarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Honey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- State v. FrenchNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.