Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. French

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1978No. 41212Published

1DissentBrodkey, J.

I must respectfully dissent. I believe that the majority opinion, although it correctly sets forth several general principles of law, misapplies those prin*141ciples to the facts of this case, and ignores other applicable law. Under the particular facts of this case, it was error for the trial court to overrule defendant’s motion for new trial.

Section 29-2101, R. R. S. 1943, provides that a new trial may be granted to a defendant for “any of the following reasons affecting materially his substantial rights: * * * newly discovered evidence material for the defendant which he could not with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fred Andrew Johnson v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden, Fort Madison PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Johnson v. GriepenstrohNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. WycoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Vassar v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API