State ex rel. Krejci v. Civil Service Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The court of appeals held that the demotion of appellant prior to the end of his probationary period did not constitute a violation of the writ which compelled his promotion originally. We agree. “The function of mandamus is to compel the performance of a present existing duty as to which there is a default. It is not granted to take effect prospectively, and it contemplates the performance of an act which is incumbent on the respondent when the application for a writ is made. ” (Emphasis added.) State, ex rel. Willis, v. Sheboy (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 167, paragraph two of the syllabus.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Walton v. Montgomery County Welfare DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Artman v. McDonoughOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Clements v. BabbOhio Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Martinelli v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Martinelli v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Sloman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.