Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Krejci v. Civil Service Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-493PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals held that the demotion of appellant prior to the end of his probationary period did not constitute a violation of the writ which compelled his promotion originally. We agree. “The function of mandamus is to compel the performance of a present existing duty as to which there is a default. It is not granted to take effect prospectively, and it contemplates the performance of an act which is incumbent on the respondent when the application for a writ is made. ” (Emphasis added.) State, ex rel. Willis, v. Sheboy (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 167, paragraph two of the syllabus.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Walton v. Montgomery County Welfare DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Artman v. McDonoughOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Clements v. BabbOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Martinelli v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Martinelli v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Sloman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API