Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Botkins v. Laws

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1994No. 1992-2144PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 383.] THE STATE EX REL. VILLAGE OF BOTKINS v. LAWS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Botkins v. Laws,

1994-Ohio-518.] Mandamus to compel Shelby County Commissioners to pay village solicitor for services provided by him in Sidney Municipal Court—Limited writ granted to compel commissioner to exercise their discretion pursuant to R.C. 1901.34(C) in determining reasonable amount of compensation due village solicitor. (No. 92-2144—Submitted March 1, 1994—Decided June 1, 1994.] IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} On October…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Massie v. Gahanna-Jefferson Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Shimola v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. Patton, 08ap-800 (3-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Brady v. Russo, 89552 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API