Legal Opinion

Clelland v. Cilione

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2001No. 97-08921; A110432Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, employer seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that held the claim compensable. Employer argues that, because he never received a copy of the request for Board review of the administrative law judge’s (AU) opinion and order, the request for review was not timely filed, the AU’s opinion became final, and the Board lacked jurisdiction to review such a final order. We review for substantial evidence and for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c), and reverse and remand for reconsideration.

The material facts are undisputed. In 1997,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Schneider v. Emanuel HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Nollen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Argonaut Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API