Legal Opinion

Nollen v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 1975No. 45354 CA 4881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) appeals from a decision of the circuit court upholding a ruling of the Workmen’s- Compensation Board. The Board ruled that it was without jurisdiction to consider the merits of SAIF’s appeal from the referee’s decision because the notice requirements of ORS 656.-295 had not been met.

Two issues are presented: First, is service on a claimant’s attorney sufficient service as to the claimant? Second, is service on the insurer of the employer sufficient service as to the employer?

Claimant was injured while in the employ of Albany Frozen Foods (employer),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Schneider v. Emanuel HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Stevens v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Murphy v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Havi Group LP v. FyockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Zandbergen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Argonaut Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Albiar v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Clelland v. CilioneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API