Legal Opinion
Garner v. Garner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 3, 1967No. 609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The law applicable to this case is well stated in Butler v. Butler, 226 N.C. 594, 39 S.E. 2d 745, where Seawell, J., speaking for the Court, said:
“The allowance of support and counsel fees pendente lite in a suit by the wife against the husband for divorce or alimony without divorce is, in certain aspects, within the discretion of the court. It is not, however, an absolute discretion to be exercised at the pleasure of the court and unreviewable. It is to be exercised within certain limits and with respect to factual conditions which are controlling. Generally speaking (and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butler v. . ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Brady v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Therrell v. TherrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973