Legal Opinion

Therrell v. Therrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1973No. 7326DC322PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The initial problem we must deal with is to determine what relief the defendant wife is seeking. It appears that defendant intended to commence a cross-action for alimony without divorce in plaintiff’s suit for divorce from bed and board, as . is permitted by G.S. 50-16.8 (b) (3), although no specific language to that effect was used by the defendant in her pleadings or otherwise.

In the defendant’s answer to the complaint, under the caption “A Further Defense and Answer and Cross Action,” appear allegations to the effect that the plaintiff abandoned the defendant, that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Garner v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knott v. KnottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Tulloch v. AdamsonRichmond County Circuit Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API