Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, I. & W. R. v. Indianapolis Union Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1922No. 3545PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John W. Peck, Judge. Foreclosure suit, in which the Indianapolis Union Railway Company and others filed a petition asking that the purchaser, the Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad Company, be required to show cause why it should not make a payment to the petitioners. From an order in favor of the petitioners, the purchaser appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

For several years prior to 1883, the Indianapolis Union Railway Company (an Indiana corporation) had been engaged at Indianapolis in operating a union railway depot and union railway tracks for the use and benefit of several railroads entering that city, its properties being owned by the various railroad com-, pañíes. The Union Railway Company had also acquired a perpetual lease of a certain belt line. On September 20, 1883, an agreement was made between the Union Railway Company and the various proprietary companies referred to1 (afterwards fully carried out) for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1865

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. Defense Plant Corporation v. United States Barge LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco R. v. ByrnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Detroit, T. & I. R. v. Detroit & T. S. L. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API