Legal Opinion

In re Villarreal

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 9, 2017No. CASE NO: 16-10253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*862MEMORANDUM OPINION CONFIRMING DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND DENYING THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Resolving ECF No. 2]

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPC• PA”) created the hanging paragraph of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (the “hanging paragraph”), which limits a debtor’s right to bifurcate and cramdown certain claims within a chapter 13 plan. Jose Arturo Villarreal, Jr. & Miriam H. Villarreal, ([‘Debtors”) propose to treat as wholly unsecured certain secured cross-collateralized…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Bullard v. Blue Hills BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re GarzaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  2. In re HernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API