Legal Opinion

Hare v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The plaintiff, Vincent Hare, claiming coverage under the Uninsured Motorists Coverage of his automobile liability insurance policy, brought this action against his insurer, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company. The Superior Court, Aroostook County, found the language of the policy precluded the plaintiff’s claim, and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff contends there exists a genuine issue as to the proper interpretation of language in the policy, making summary judgment inappropriate. We agree, and vacate the judgment of the Superior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Portland Valve, Inc. v. Rockwood Systems Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Blue Rock Industries v. Raymond International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Lewiston Firefighters Ass'n, Local 785 v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Lidstone v. GreenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rowe v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. Brackett v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Greenvall v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Maurice v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API