Legal Opinion
Anker v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided May 26, 1989No. M-89-20PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiffs have noticed the deposition of Dr. Malcolm Potts, who is not a party to this action, and issued a subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Rule 45, Fed.R.Civ.P., for his testimony and for the production of 77 categories of documents. Dr. Potts responded with a motion for a protective order seeking to postpone the deposition because of his immediate travel plans, which was shortly followed by a motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Rule 45(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., or in the alternative, or in addition thereto, to grant a protective…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kaufman v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burka v. United States Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Pikes Peak Family Housing, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Schaaf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Mortgage Information Services, Inc. v. KitchensDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Flanagan v. Wyndham International Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.