Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Bicknell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 15, 2009No. 99,503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

Tammy J. Adamson appeals on a number of issues arising out of her personal injury suit against Kody J. Bicknell. Bicknell filed a cross-appeal with regard to a pretrial discovery determination made by the district court. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court’s decision to deny Adamson’s motion to amend petition to include punitive damages and accordingly remand for a new trial to include a claim for punitive damages. Moreover, we reverse the district court’s decision to exclude evidence of medical expenses in the amount of $2,823.85 and $6,097.30, medical…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Miami County National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Fusaro v. First Family Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. In the Interest of M.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Reeves v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Adkins v. HontzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Adamson v. BicknellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API