Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1998No. 79,540PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

An intoxicated driver appeals an award of punitive damages assessed against him by the district court in a personal injury action. Plaintiff cross-appeals, claiming the jury’s denial of loss of work time was inconsistent with the evidence at trial.

On November 19, 1994, Carlson was employed by codefendant David Holland, d/b/a Dave’s Pumping Service. As part of his job, Carlson made deliveries and pickups in his employer’s one-ton Chevrolet pickup truck. The pickup truck was equipped with dual rear tires and hauled a 500-gallon steel sewage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gould v. Taco BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Hurlbut v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Lanning v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  5. Mathes v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Reynolds v. Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Hayes Sight & Sound, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API