Adamson v. Bicknell
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
Kody Bicknell seeks our review of a Court of Appeals decision permitting Tammy Adamson to pursue punitive damages in her lawsuit against him after Bicknell rear-ended Adamson’s vehicle at a train crossing. The punitive damages claim was based, in part, on BicknelTs positive screening in a postcollision test for marijuana and cocaine, on his admission that he was smoking marijuana approximately 4 hours before the collision, and on a significant quantity of marijuana discovered in BicknelTs vehicle. He later acknowledged his drug consumption…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Frazier v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Folks v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Alain Ellis Living Trust v. Harvey D. Ellis Living TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Acord v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Brent v. Walmart Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.