Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1983No. 1264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered on December 11, 1981 for the crimes of Rape (18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121(1)), Statutory Rape (18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3122), Indecent Assault (18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3126(1)) and Corruption of Minors (18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301). 1 We affirm in part and quash in part.

Appellant, Strickland Joseph Smith, questions the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the sentence. We find that neither claim justifies a reversal of the lower court’s judgment order.

The facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict winner, reveal that the 13-year-old…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. GumpertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. TrunzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API